"Je ne dis pas que l’État est la solution de tous les problèmes, mais l’État est une des seules armes que nous ayons pour contrôler toutes sortes de fonctionnement et de processus tout à fait vitaux, et en particulier tous ceux qui touchent à l’intérêt général et aux services publics. Je suis tout à fait favorable à la création d’un État transnational ou mondial. Mais, dans l’état actuel, c’est une utopie. Cela dit, la taxe Tobin, c’est un pas vers l’État mondial. Keynes disait déjà qu’il fallait faire une banque mondiale, ce qui va dans le sens de l’État mondial. Et il faudrait ensuite pouvoir contrôler cette banque, et prélever les impôts pour l’alimenter. Mais peut-être est-ce une utopie un peu folle. En attendant cet État mondial, je pense que les États nationaux sont le seul instrument que nous ayons pour opérer une redistribution raisonnable des revenus des plus riches aux plus pauvres, pour égaliser les chances d’accès à l’économie, à la culture. Donc, on ne peut dire qu’on va se passer de l’État.
En tout cas, ce qui est sûr, c’est que les conséquences de la destruction de l’État, on ne les verra que dans vingt ans. Par exemple, dans vingt ans on dira que le taux de cancer a augmenté dans les villes en liaison avec la pollution. Je trouve anormal que les médecins ne le disent pas maintenant. (On commence à dire très prudemment que le taux d’asthmatiques parmi les enfants a très fortement augmenté en liaison avec la pollution.)"
Bourdieu, Entretien du 26 janvier 2000 par Bertrand Chung, Mondialisation et domination : de la finance à la culture, Cités, 2012/3 (n° 51), Bourdieu politique , PUF, 2012, p.133

Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Connell. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Connell. Afficher tous les articles

samedi 21 avril 2018

The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, Edited by Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz


The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu  
Edited by Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz
Oxford University Press
2018


Présentation de l'éditeur
Pierre Bourdieu was arguably the most important social theorist of the twentieth century. A French sociologist, he produced during his lifetime scores of empirical studies that laid the foundation for a rich theoretical program. These included studies of French colonialism in Algeria, the education system in France, new forms of state power, and the rise of autonomous artistic and scientific fields. Bourdieu’s research program was grounded in concepts such as habitus, field, forms of capital, and symbolic domination. Although most of these concepts have long historical legacies, Bourdieu elaborated conjoined them in an entirely originzal way, This Handbook assesses Pierred Bourdieu’s legacy from the standpoint of the early twenty-first century. It brings together a diverse array of contributors who consider how Bourdieu has advanced research and thinking in a variety of fields and areas. In particular, it considers how Bourdieu’s work has been appropriated for study in various regions of the world; how scholars have used Bourdieu to understand emergent transnational phenomena; how Bourdieu’s ideas have reshaped various disciplines and subfields; the ways in which Bourdieu’s concepts are embedded in long-standing theoretical traditions and debates; and the many ways in which Bourdieu’s research has generated entirely new fields and objects of study. 

Thomas Medvetz is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego and author of Think Tanks in America
Jeffrey J. Sallaz is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Arizona and author of The Labor of Luck and Labor, Economy and Societ


lundi 2 décembre 2013

Sociology & Empire. The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline . Edited by George Steinmetz


Sociology & Empire
The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline
Edited by George Steinmetz
Duke University Press
2013

Présentation de l'éditeur
The revelation that the U.S. Department of Defense had hired anthropologists for its Human Terrain System project—assisting its operations in Afghanistan and Iraq—caused an uproar that has obscured the participation of sociologists in similar Pentagon-funded projects. As the contributors to Sociology and Empire show, such affiliations are not new. Sociologists have been active as advisers, theorists, and analysts of Western imperialism for more than a century.
The collection has a threefold agenda: to trace an intellectual history of sociology as it pertains to empire; to offer empirical studies based around colonies and empires, both past and present; and to provide a theoretical basis for future sociological analyses that may take empire more fully into account. In the 1940s, the British Colonial Office began employing sociologists in its African colonies. In Nazi Germany, sociologists played a leading role in organizing the occupation of Eastern Europe. In the United States, sociology contributed to modernization theory, which served as an informal blueprint for the postwar American empire. This comprehensive anthology critiques sociology's disciplinary engagement with colonialism in varied settings while also highlighting the lasting contributions that sociologists have made to the theory and history of imperialism.
Contributors. Albert Bergesen, Ou-Byung Chae, Andy Clarno, Raewyn Connell, Ilya Gerasimov, Julian Go, Daniel Goh, Chandan Gowda, Krishan Kumar, Fuyuki Kurasawa, Michael Mann, Marina Mogilner, Besnik Pula, Anne Raffin, Emmanuelle Saada, Marco Santoro, Kim Scheppele, George Steinmetz, Alexander Semyonov, Andrew Zimmerman