« Je pense que les peuples ont pris conscience du fait qu’ils avaient des intérêts communs et qu’il y avait des intérêts planétaires qui sont liés à l’existence de la terre, des intérêts que l’on pourrait appeler cosmologiques, dans la mesure où ils concernent le monde dans son ensemble ».
Pierre Bourdieu (1992)


Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Santoro. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Santoro. Afficher tous les articles

dimanche 10 mai 2020

Ideas on the Move in the Social Sciences and Humanities. The International Circulation of Paradigms and Theorists. Edited by Gisèle Sapiro, Marco Santoro, Patrick Baert

Ideas on the Move in the Social Sciences and Humanities 
The International Circulation of Paradigms and Theorists
Edited by Gisèle Sapiro, Marco Santoro, Patrick Baert
Palgrave Macmillan
Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences  
2020
 
 
Présentation de l'éditeur
This edited collection analyses the reception of a selection of key thinkers, and the dissemination of paradigms, theories and controversies across the social sciences and humanities since 1945. It draws on data collected from textbooks, curricula, interviews, archives, and references in scientific journals, from a broad range of countries and disciplines to provide an international and comparative perspective that will shed fresh light on the circulation of ideas in the social and human sciences.
The contributions cover high-profile disputes on methodology, epistemology, and research practices, and the international reception of theorists that have abiding and interdisciplinary relevance, such as: Antonio Gramsci, Hannah Arendt, Karl Polanyi, Pierre Bourdieu, Michel Foucault, Edward Said and Gayatri Spivak. This important work will be a valuable resource to scholars of the history of ideas and the philosophy of the social sciences; in addition to researchers in the fields of social, cultural and literary theory.
Gisèle Sapiro is Professor of Sociology at the EHESS and Research Director at the CNRS, France.
Marco Santoro is Professor of Sociology at the University of Bologna, Italy.
Patrick Baert is Professor of Social Theory at the University of Cambridge, UK.






samedi 21 avril 2018

The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, Edited by Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz


The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu  
Edited by Thomas Medvetz and Jeffrey J. Sallaz
Oxford University Press
2018


Présentation de l'éditeur
Pierre Bourdieu was arguably the most important social theorist of the twentieth century. A French sociologist, he produced during his lifetime scores of empirical studies that laid the foundation for a rich theoretical program. These included studies of French colonialism in Algeria, the education system in France, new forms of state power, and the rise of autonomous artistic and scientific fields. Bourdieu’s research program was grounded in concepts such as habitus, field, forms of capital, and symbolic domination. Although most of these concepts have long historical legacies, Bourdieu elaborated conjoined them in an entirely originzal way, This Handbook assesses Pierred Bourdieu’s legacy from the standpoint of the early twenty-first century. It brings together a diverse array of contributors who consider how Bourdieu has advanced research and thinking in a variety of fields and areas. In particular, it considers how Bourdieu’s work has been appropriated for study in various regions of the world; how scholars have used Bourdieu to understand emergent transnational phenomena; how Bourdieu’s ideas have reshaped various disciplines and subfields; the ways in which Bourdieu’s concepts are embedded in long-standing theoretical traditions and debates; and the many ways in which Bourdieu’s research has generated entirely new fields and objects of study. 

Thomas Medvetz is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego and author of Think Tanks in America. 
Jeffrey J. Sallaz is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Arizona and author of The Labor of Luck and Labor, Economy and Societ


samedi 7 janvier 2017

Pierre Bourdieu, Forme di capitale




Pierre Bourdieu
Forme di capitale 
A cura di Marco Santoro
Armando
Classici della sociologia 
2015

Présentation de l'éditeur
Il saggio, che qui si traduce per la prima volta in italiano, è tra i contributi fondamentali di Bourdieu alla teoria sociale. In esso viene presentata la teoria delle forme di capitale che costituisce uno dei capisaldi della teoria del mondo sociale del sociologo francese – esito tra i più lucidi e proficui di quel progetto di integrazione tra Marx, Weber e Durkheim (e non solo) in una nuova sintesi teorica che costituisce la cifra della prestazione intellettuale di Bourdieu.
 Pierre Bourdieu (Denguin 1930 - Paris 2002) è uno tra i più influenti e prolifici sociologi della seconda metà del Novecento.
 Marco Santoro è professore associato di Sociologia presso il Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione dell’Università di Bologna






lundi 5 septembre 2016

The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology, Edited by David Inglis and Anna-Mari Almila

The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology
Edited by David Inglis and Anna-Mari Almila
Sage
2016

Présentation de l'éditeur
Cultural sociology - or the sociology of culture - has grown from a minority interest in the 1970s to become one of the largest and most vibrant areas within sociology globally. In The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology, a global range of experts explore the theory, methodology and innovations that make up this ever-expanding field.
The Handbook's 40 original chapters have been organised into five thematic sections:
  • Theoretical Paradigms
  • Major Methodological Perspectives
  • Domains of Inquiry
  • Cultural Sociology in Contexts
  • Cultural Sociology and Other Analytical Approaches
Both comprehensive and current, The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology will be an essential reference tool for both advanced students and scholars across sociology, cultural studies and media studies.
Preview


lundi 1 août 2016

The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu, Edited by Derek Robbins

The Anthem Companion to 
Pierre Bourdieu 
Edited by Derek Robbins 
Anthem Press
2016
 
 Présentation de l'éditeur
‘The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu’ offers the best contemporary work on Pierre Bourdieu, written by the best scholars currently working in this field. Original, authoritative and wide-ranging, the critical assessments of this volume will make it ideal for Bourdieu students and scholars alike.
‘Anthem Companions to Sociology’ offer authoritative and comprehensive assessments of major figures in the development of sociology from the last two centuries. Covering the major advancements in sociological thought, these companions offer critical evaluations of key figures in the American and European sociological tradition, and will provide students and scholars with both an in-depth assessment of the makers of sociology and chart their relevance to modern society.
Dr Derek Robbins is Professor of International Social Theory in the School of Law and Social Sciences (LSS) at the University of East London, UK.

Table of contents.
Acknowledgements.
Editor’s Introduction.
Part I. Aspects of Bourdieu’s thought
1. The Sociological Challenge of Reflexivity in Bourdieusian Thought.
(Simon Susan)
2. Sociology at the Scale of the Individual. Archer and Lahire contra Bourdieu.
(Frédéric Vandenberghe)
3. Bourdieu and international social science.
(Derek Robbins)
Part II. Case-studies of the international deployment of Bourdieu’s thought.
4. Bourdieu inside Europe. The European circulation of Bourdieu’s ideas.
(Marco Santoro and Andrea Gallelli)
5. The principle of differentiation in Japanese society and international knowledge transfer between Bourdieu and Japan.
(Shinichi Aizawa and Naoki Iso)
6. Worlds Within And Beyond Words: Bourdieu And The Limits Of Theory.
(Sheena Jain)
7. Social transformation and cultural reproduction: a bourdieusian analysis of post-reform China.
(Yang Yang and Xuanyang Gao)
8. Bourdieu’s use and reception: A Latin American perspective on the problems of conceptual transfer.
(Maria Luisa Mendez)
Notes on contributors.
Author index.
Subject index.

lundi 2 décembre 2013

Sociology & Empire. The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline . Edited by George Steinmetz


Sociology & Empire
The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline
Edited by George Steinmetz
Duke University Press
2013

Présentation de l'éditeur
The revelation that the U.S. Department of Defense had hired anthropologists for its Human Terrain System project—assisting its operations in Afghanistan and Iraq—caused an uproar that has obscured the participation of sociologists in similar Pentagon-funded projects. As the contributors to Sociology and Empire show, such affiliations are not new. Sociologists have been active as advisers, theorists, and analysts of Western imperialism for more than a century.
The collection has a threefold agenda: to trace an intellectual history of sociology as it pertains to empire; to offer empirical studies based around colonies and empires, both past and present; and to provide a theoretical basis for future sociological analyses that may take empire more fully into account. In the 1940s, the British Colonial Office began employing sociologists in its African colonies. In Nazi Germany, sociologists played a leading role in organizing the occupation of Eastern Europe. In the United States, sociology contributed to modernization theory, which served as an informal blueprint for the postwar American empire. This comprehensive anthology critiques sociology's disciplinary engagement with colonialism in varied settings while also highlighting the lasting contributions that sociologists have made to the theory and history of imperialism.
Contributors. Albert Bergesen, Ou-Byung Chae, Andy Clarno, Raewyn Connell, Ilya Gerasimov, Julian Go, Daniel Goh, Chandan Gowda, Krishan Kumar, Fuyuki Kurasawa, Michael Mann, Marina Mogilner, Besnik Pula, Anne Raffin, Emmanuelle Saada, Marco Santoro, Kim Scheppele, George Steinmetz, Alexander Semyonov, Andrew Zimmerman

vendredi 25 mars 2011

Cultural Sociology, March 2011; 5 (1)

::::